How Long Has The Dry Cleaning Industry Been Shrinking
Introduction
Dry Cleaning and the Utilize of Perchloroethylene
Dry cleaning uses non-aqueous solvents to clean fabrics (1). The get-go dry cleaning operations in the United States (US) date back to the 1800s when people washed fabrics in open tubs with solvents such as gasoline, kerosene, benzene, turpentine, and petroleum then hung to dry. In the 1900s, the US started using specialized machines for the dry cleaning procedure. However, the utilise of highly flammable petroleum solvents caused many fires and explosions, highlighting the demand to discover a safer alternative. The dry out cleaning manufacture first introduced Stoddard solvent (less flammable than gasoline) followed by several nonflammable halogenated solvents, such every bit carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene (TCE), trichlorotrifluoroethane, and perchloroethylene (PERC). Start in the 1940s, PERC—likewise known every bit tetrachloroethylene or PCE—became the well-nigh frequently used dry cleaning solvent (1, two) and continues to be the chief solvent used to dry out clean fabrics both in the Us (three) and the European Union (EU) (4).
To comply with environmental regulations, dry cleaning machines have evolved through several "generations" to minimize PERC release. The 1st generation machines were "transfer machines," where cleaned fabrics were manually transferred from the washer to a dryer. Since then, various pollution prevention controls have been implemented through the subsequent generations, culminating in the latest 5th generation machines, which are closed-loop and equipped with refrigerated condensers, carbon absorbers, inductive fans, and sensor-actuated lockout devices (1, 4–6). Every bit the newer generations of machines were introduced, the corporeality of PERC used was reduced from 300 to 500 thousand-PERC/kilogram of fabrics (1st generation) to <10 one thousand-PERC/kilogram cleaned garment (5th generation) (four). In many EU countries, dry cleaning machines older than 15 years are typically prohibited—only 5th generation machines are allowed. However, 4th generation machines may be used if best practices (e.one thousand., skillful housekeeping, optimal car operation, and recycling) are implemented and they run across Eu emission requirements (four, seven). The US EPA's National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) regulations stipulate that 2d generation machines must be upgraded to 4th generation, and 3rd generation machines must be retrofitted or upgraded to 4th generation machines; just quaternary generation and later machines can exist sold, leased, or installed (viii).
As of 2017 in the US, there are ~20,600 dry cleaning shops and the manufacture employs nearly 160,000 workers, with ~fourscore% identifying as a racial or ethnic minority (9, 10). The majority of owners are of Korean ancestry (eleven). Nationwide, 60–65% of dry cleaners use PERC as their primary solvent (1) and most of the residuum utilize a high-flashpoint hydrocarbon. Other solvents currently used in the US include butylal, siloxane, liquid carbon dioxide, glycol ethers, and water (professional person wet cleaning). In Europe, sixty–90% of dry cleaning shops use PERC, depending on the country (4).
Health and Environmental Impacts of Perchloroethylene
PERC is a respiratory and skin irritant, neurotoxicant, liver and kidney toxicant, and reproductive and developmental toxicant (12–17). PERC is also considered a "potential occupational carcinogen" (18), "probable to exist carcinogenic to humans by all routes of exposure" (14, xix), and "probably carcinogenic to humans" (20). Neurotoxicity is the most sensitive non-cancer adverse health effect associated with PERC, with negative outcomes occurring even at depression-dose exposures (16). Specifically, chronic (i.eastward., years) or sub-chronic (i.e., months) PERC exposure in humans has been associated with deficits in color vision and neuropsychological function in both occupational and community exposure studies (16).
A comprehensive review of 109 occupational studies with personal exposure measures estimated a mean exposure to PERC of 59 parts per million (ppm) among dry cleaning workers (2), with <ten ppm for spotters, pressers, and counter clerks and >100 ppm for machine operators. Some other study in 2014 in Kingdom of the netherlands surveyed ambience PERC concentrations for 193 dry cleaning shops before and later implementing a certification plan that customers tin use to select shops that are more safe and environmental friendly (4). Before the programme, nearly 77% of shops reported fifteen-min time-weighted boilerplate (TWA) airborne concentrations ≥35 ppm. After the program, all shops showed a 15-min TWA of <35 ppm. These reductions were encouraging and below the European Spousal relationship 15-min TWA limit of twoscore ppm. However, decrements in visual reproduction, pattern memory, and pattern recognition were found among 65 workers when exposed to an average TWA concentration of <50 ppm for at least 3 years (21). Decrements on cognitive tests of attention and visual perception were seen in 100 workers with average total-shift TWA exposures of 12 ppm (22). Decrements were also found with cognitive tests of attention, specifically dumb reaction time, and vigilance among sixty workers typically exposed to TWA of fifteen ppm (23). Reduced performance on vocal reaction time to visual stimuli was seen among 35 workers with TWA equally depression as 8 ppm (24). Residents who lived virtually a dry cleaning shop for an boilerplate of 10.6 years (mean indoor air concentration of 0.7 ppm) were found to have reduced cerebral performance on a test of reaction time, vigilance, and visual memory (25).
Numerous communities have been impacted through exposure to PERC. A cluster of communities on Cape Cod, Massachusetts has been extensively studied following years of PERC exposure. In this region, some water pipes were replaced with vinyl-lined asbestos-cement pipes (26). The vinyl lining was applied with a slurry of vinyl resin and PERC. Although it was believed that the PERC would evaporate before installation, subsequent water quality testing revealed that the people living in these communities were being exposed to PERC in their drinking h2o, ranging from 1.5 to 7,750 μg/L (26, 27). Residents experienced adverse reproductive health outcomes, including delayed time-to-pregnancy (27, 28), increased take a chance of placental abruptions (27, 28), and an increased adventure of congenital malformations (29). Exposure during the prenatal and early childhood period as well yielded adverse impacts in adulthood, including reduced performance on neuropsychological tests (26), increased risk of bipolar disorder (27, 30), Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (27, xxx), illicit drug use (31, 32), vision problems (33), and certain types of cancer (32, 34, 35). Nonetheless, no literature was establish that describes the regional bear on of community PERC exposures through other routes, such as inhalation.
PERC is a persistent pollutant that can contaminate air, soil, groundwater, drinking water, and is potentially toxic to wild fauna (13, 30, 31, 34). The recent draft The states EPA risk evaluation on PERC found ecology risks to aquatic organisms (36). PERC poses a hazard to ecology aquatic receptors, including aquatic invertebrates, fish, and aquatic plants. The most sensitive species for acute toxicity were two daphnid species, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia magna; the acute toxicity value was as low as 2.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L). PERC presents an acute adventure to fish based on the mortality of rainbow trout (the almost sensitive species) with acute toxicity values as depression equally 3.6 mg/Fifty for bloodshed (i.eastward., the LCl—the concentration required to kill 50% of the population) (37). For chronic exposures, PERC is a adventure to aquatic invertebrates, with a chronic toxicity value of 0.five mg/L, and a chronic toxicity value of 0.8 mg/Fifty for fish (38). PERC is besides a adventure for light-green microalgae with toxicity values as depression as 0.02 mg/50 (38).
Regulations for Perchloroethylene
Since 1988, U.s.a. workplaces have been regulated by the U.s. Occupational Safety and Wellness Administration (OSHA) with enforceable occupational exposure limits for PERC of 100 ppm for a full-shift (eight-h TWA) and 200 ppm for a ceiling limit (39). The European Marriage set lower limits than OSHA, with 20 ppm (138 mg/m3) for the viii-h TWA and 40 ppm (275 mg/kthree) for the xv-min brusk-term TWA (38). PERC emissions take besides been regulated since the 1990s under NESHAPS (5). By 2003, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) established its Not-Toxic Dry out Cleaning Incentive Program (AB998) to assistance dry cleaners transition away from PERC (forty). In 2007, CARB initiated a phase-out of the use of PERC dry out cleaning machines in the Land of California by January ane, 2023 (41). This regulatory action by CARB promoted the adoption of new technologies nationwide.
Under the Make clean Air Act (in the Terminal Amendments to Air Toxics Standards for Perchloroethylene Dry out Cleaners), the US EPA stipulates that all PERC machines be removed from residential buildings by December 21, 2020, and replaced with not-PERC technology (42). PERC is besides ane of the commencement ten chemicals being evaluated by EPA nether the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemic Safety for the 21st Century Act (Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act), which amended TSCA (amended TSCA) (43). In 2020, a draft risk evaluation released by the U.s. EPA preliminarily found unreasonable risk to workers, occupational non-users, consumers, bystanders, and the environment from certain uses of PERC, including its use in dry cleaning (36). Consequently, the United states EPA may issue a national ban on the employ of PERC in dry cleaning by 2021. None of the European union countries have banned the use of PERC in dry cleaning because they considered that the health and safety of dry cleaners is assured past implementing command measures. Although over 90% of dry out cleaning shops still use PERC in French republic, PERC dry cleaning machines will be phased-out in residential areas by 2022 (44).
The Toxics Use Reduction Constitute (TURI) ranked the available alternatives against PERC, based on technical, economic, environmental, regulatory, and homo health criteria. The alternatives were so placed into one of five groupings, with group 1 existence the well-nigh preferred and group v the least preferred. Professional moisture cleaning (i.east., water) was the simply group ane alternative, followed by liquid carbon dioxide (group two); high flashpoint hydrocarbons, butylal (acetal), and propylene glycol ethers (grouping iii); siloxane (group 4), and finally n-propyl bromide (northward-PB) (group 5) (45). A comprehensive review of fabric cleaning technologies was likewise published by investigators at RMIT University, Australia (46) that focused on ecological attributes and sustainability of safe apparel cleaning method alternatives to PERC. This review emphasized professional wet cleaning as the most desirable alternative.
Given the ample bear witness of the health and environmental impacts of PERC, every bit well every bit the many regulations and policy initiatives that make the case to minimize or eliminate PERC in the US and abroad, the main objectives of this paper are to (1) provide an overview of the land of the knowledge regarding safer alternatives to PERC in dry cleaning, with emphasis on studies related to human exposure and wellness; (ii) highlight efforts to transition away from PERC in dry cleaning in the United states and in particular in King County, WA, USA; and (iii) discuss the implications for futurity public wellness research and policy for PERC in dry cleaning and safer alternatives.
Word
Alternatives to Perchloroethylene
n-Propyl Bromide
The promotion of n-Atomic number 82 (also known as i-bromopropane or 1-BP) is a case study in "regrettable substitution," which is defined as "the substitution of hazardous substances with substances with similar chemical structure and similar hazard backdrop or with substances with other effects of like concern" (38). n-PB is the only driblet-in substitute for PERC (i.e., it tin can exist used in an existing PERC machine with minor modifications). The other alternatives require investment in expensive new dry cleaning equipment. n-Atomic number 82 was marketed equally a safer alternative considering it does not deplete stratospheric ozone. However, this brominated hydrocarbon is extremely toxic to humans via inhalation and is a potent irritant and neurotoxicant. north-PB is also reasonably anticipated to be a man carcinogen (47). In 2008, a instance study was published that a dry out cleaner located in New Jersey developed neurological symptoms after switching from PERC to n-PB (48). Also in New Bailiwick of jersey, exceedances of the ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (TLV) of ten ppm for northward-PB (49) were documented in dry out cleaning shops that had switched from PERC (50). The authors surmised that leakage of n-Atomic number 82 from these machines likely reflected the relatively poor condition of the aging PERC dry cleaning equipment and failure to brand needed modifications. Forth with PERC, north-Lead is one of the first ten chemicals being evaluated under the amended TSCA (51).
Volatile Methyl Siloxanes
Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane or D5, a volatile methyl siloxane, is a colorless, odorless liquid and is non considered a Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) per state and federal air quality regulations. However, there are concerns near the global environmental distribution of this chemical grade (52). Although the Canadian regime recognized the environmental persistence of siloxanes, in 2013 information technology ended that they practise not pose a threat to the environment (53). A chronic toxicity written report in female rats suggested that siloxanes caused uterine cancer at the highest concentration (54, 55). Nevertheless, the study authors concluded that the findings of uterine tumors in rats are not relevant to humans. The 2014 Safety Information Sheet (SDS) reviewed by the New York State Section of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) states that "This product is non considered to be a carcinogen by IARC, ACGIH, NTP, or OSHA" (56). In conclusion, although the carcinogenicity data for siloxanes are equivocal, a meta-analysis of the toxicological data presented in the Toxnot hazard screening tool revealed that this chemic course poses a very high chance for ecology persistence (57).
Glycol Ethers
Several glycol ether formulations are available, including dipropylene glycol tert-butyl ethers (DPTB), dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether (DPNB), and propylene glycol t-butyl ether (PGtBE). These are organic and biodegradable solvents with low volatility and a high flashpoint. Make names include Rynex® and Solvair®. There is express data about the toxicity of DPNB and DPTB. The California Office of Ecology Health Hazard Cess (OEHHA) lists PGtBE as a potential carcinogen for consideration under Proposition 65 (58).
Butylal
Butylal is marketed by Kreussler GmbH equally Solvon K4TM and is role of a relatively new dry cleaning process chosen System K4TM (59). Solvon K4TM is composed primarily of butylal, which is a diether acetal. Synonyms for butylal include dibutoxymethane, 1-(butoxymethoxy)butane, and formaldehyde dibutyl acetal. Co-ordinate to the manufacturer, n-butyl alcohol (ane-butanol) and formaldehyde are present at <0.5 and <0.05%, respectively (60). While butylal is reportedly stable at pHs between 4 and fourteen, the solvent might theoretically hydrolyze in the dry-cleaning machine to create formaldehyde in the presence of acid and rut.
Although the solvent is reportedly slightly biodegradable, in that location is little published data concerning its aquatic toxicity (61). An LC50 for Solvon K4TM of 45.7 mg/Fifty was derived in a 96-h static renewal fish bioassay with juvenile rainbow trout (62); PERC was establish to exist greater than x times more than toxic than Solvon K4TM in the aforementioned bioassay (PERC LC50 = 3.61 mg/L) (37).
The available data on butylal's effects on human health are limited to dermal and oral exposures (63). TURI ended that toxicological information are lacking for this solvent, rendering the homo health assessment incomplete (45).
Inhalation exposure cess of dry cleaners using Solvon-K4TM revealed that the highest exposures (upwards to 1.9 ppm of butylal) were during pressing, spot cleaning, as well as loading and unloading the dry cleaning machine (64, 65). The operator wore leather gloves to clean out the still bottoms and butylal was detected in all four dermal samples from the operator's gloved hands. Although no occupational exposure limits exist for butylal, in that location is a risk of skin irritation (66). When control banding techniques were used to assess inhalation and dermal risks (64), the exposures noted at these shops suggested that better controls were needed. Further, inhalation of formaldehyde and butanol (potential hydrolysis products of butylal) were likewise assessed but exposures were either very low or not detected.
Loftier-Flashpoint Hydrocarbons
These petroleum-based solvents are equanimous of aliphatic hydrocarbons and take relatively high flammability (flashpoints of 140–150°F) and volatility. Examples of these solvents include Exxon-Mobil's DF-2000TM and Chevron Phillips' EcoSolv®. They are classified as synthetic hydrocarbons and are produced using specific feedstocks and procedure conditions that yield isoparaffins that are low in impurities (67). Chemical analysis of DF-2000TM and EcoSolv® confirmed that they contain between xi and 15 carbons every bit their main structural backbone (i.e., C11 to C15) and do non contain detectable levels of benzene or other hazardous aromatic hydrocarbons (64, 65, 68, 69). Both products are essentially insoluble in h2o and failed to elicit bloodshed to juvenile rainbow trout at the highest exam concentrations (v,000 mg/Fifty for DF-2000TM and 100 mg/L for EcoSolv®). In the DF-2000TM bioassay, the measured concentration in the test vessel containing 5,000 mg/L of solvent was less than the reporting detection limit of 235 micrograms per liter (μg/Fifty) (68, 69).
The Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County, WA, The states (Haz Waste Plan) reviewed these products and concluded that the uncertainty concerning the toxicological properties of this chemical class reflects: (1) the inclusion of diverse products by some investigators in the category of "hydrocarbon dry cleaning solvents," some of which may comprise benzene and other hazardous substances (east.grand., Stoddard solvent), and (two) the inadequacy of Chemic Abstract Service (CAS) numbers to uniquely identify specific products within this chemical course; the assigned CAS numbers apply primarily to feedstocks, rather than the finished products (68). However, the authors ended that there are information gaps in their toxicity and bioaccumulative potential. Because loftier-flashpoint hydrocarbons are regarded as VOCs past land and federal agencies, they can have adverse impacts on ambience air quality (68).
Inhalation and dermal exposure assessment of dry out cleaners using DF-2000TM revealed that the highest personal airborne exposures occurred when workers loaded and unloaded the dry out cleaning machines and pressed dry cleaned fabrics. The highest detected full-shift air concentration was 21 milligrams/cubic meter (mg/m3), which is considerably lower than the occupational exposure limit of 300 mg/m3 (i.east., the GESTIS International eight-h Limit Value for CAS number 64742-48-ix) (70). The greatest opportunity for dermal exposure occurred when solid waste (still bottoms) was removed from the dry out cleaning machine for disposal; DF-2000TM was detected at very low levels in two of the six dermal samples from the dry cleaners' gloved hands (64, 65).
Liquid Carbon Dioxide
This applied science combines carbon dioxide with specialized detergents under high pressure level (700 psi) and is considered to be non-toxic, not-combustible, non-corrosive, and environmentally condom (46). However, the high price of the initial capital investment in addition to the ongoing costs for specialized detergents and maintenance has made this technology prohibitively expensive for most dry cleaners (45).
Professional Wet Cleaning (PWC)
In PWC, fabrics are cleaned with water and detergent in a computer-controlled washing automobile with multiple fabric-specific cleaning programs. In advanced PWC machines, additional products are added to the washing drum, depending on the type of fabric being cleaned. These products protect fibers during drying, forestall dye haemorrhage, provide suppleness to leather, etc. The washed fabrics are then placed in a specialized dryer equipped with wet sensors to ensure that fabrics practise not shrink after excessive drying. In contrast to PERC and most other solvent-based dry out cleaning methods, PWC does non generate hazardous organic solvent waste (71). Another do good of PWC is that the ancillary process chemicals, including detergents and spot cleaners, are typically less chancy than those used in PERC and loftier-flashpoint hydrocarbon dry cleaning (72–74).
Although PWC has been used every bit an alternative to PERC in the United states for over two decades, the dry cleaning community has been slow to prefer this technology. The benefits of PWC and the industry pressures and other factors that take prevented wider adoption of this technology were described as early every bit 2001 (75). Others accept also documented the considerable wellness, environmental, and economical benefits of using PWC relative to PERC (4, 45, 46, 76–78).
Promoting Safer Alternatives to PERC in the Us
Several jurisdictions have encouraged or mandated a transition away from PERC. The Country of California provided $10,000 grants to PERC dry cleaners to transition to non-toxic and non-smog forming technologies such as PWC and liquid carbon dioxide (forty). The Commonwealth of Massachusetts offered grants of upward to $ten,000 to transition away from PERC (79). The City of Minneapolis banned the use of PERC and became the first PERC-free city in the nation in January 2018 (80). The City of Philadelphia extended the US EPA phase-out of PERC dry cleaning operations located in residential buildings to include hospitals, daycares, schools, health clinics, community centers, and recreation areas (81). The City of New York, amidst other deportment, required all dry cleaners to mail the type of chemicals they use via public "right to know" legislation (82).
Promoting Safer Alternatives to PERC in King County, WA, United states
Learning From the Manufacture
The Haz Waste Program has provided technical and fiscal aid to the local dry cleaning community since the 1990s. These efforts accept included technical and fiscal help with pollution prevention, enrollment in an environmental recognition programme ("EnviroStars"), grants for culling dry cleaning equipment, exposure monitoring, and sponsorship of local dry out cleaning association meetings (71). The programme has also conducted many interviews and focus groups with dry cleaning business owners and vendors.
In 2010, a countywide survey (six, 83) revealed that 69% of dry out cleaners in Male monarch County, WA, USA, were nevertheless using PERC and that cost was the principal barrier to shops adopting safer technologies. Other central findings included that fourscore% of shops were owned and operated by immigrants from South Korea. Subsequent field visits revealed that when shops had employees, they were typically people of Latin American descent (84). From an equity and social justice perspective, the program considered this to be a vulnerable and underserved population that requires particular protection from the agin health effects associated with PERC and other hazardous substances. The median age of PERC dry out cleaning machines in King County, WA, USA was 18 years, which exceeds their expected service life of ~15 years (six, 83). Older machines tin be prone to leaks and other mechanical problems.
Pick of the Preferred Alternatives
The Haz Waste material Program reviewed the available alternatives to select a technology to promote in Rex Canton, WA, USA. Role of this review process included evaluating safer alternatives that had been adopted elsewhere in the Usa. For instance, the NYSDEC has reviewed most of the common alternative dry out cleaning solvents, and all just northward-Atomic number 82 are currently approved for employ in New York State (85).
Upon discussing alternatives to PERC with the Rex County dry cleaning community, their preferred system was loftier-flashpoint hydrocarbon (71). In Rex County, WA, USA the primary alternative technologies available to local dry cleaners are high-flashpoint hydrocarbon and butylal (run into Tabular array 1). The Haz Waste Program was not aware of whatsoever local shops that were using n-Lead, siloxanes, glycol ethers, or liquid carbon dioxide. By 2010, 27% of shops had already adopted loftier-flashpoint hydrocarbon in King Canton, WA, USA (vi, 83). Stated reasons for doing then included the belief that loftier-flashpoint hydrocarbon tin can clean all fabrics and is similar enough to PERC that piddling grooming is required for owners and staff, resulting in less downtime.
Table i. The most prevalent cleaning systems in King Canton, WA, United states.
Before the advent of the latest PWC applied science, the Haz Waste Plan provided financial incentives for shops to transition principally to high-flashpoint hydrocarbon (see Table ii). Nevertheless, dry cleaners continued to use hazardous spot cleaning products from their PERC operations and the solid waste stream (i.eastward., still bottoms) was determined to be a dangerous waste, based on its toxicity in a fish bioassay (72, 73, 89, xc). The Haz Waste Program also witnessed contagion of high-flashpoint hydrocarbon machines and waste streams from the use of process chemicals that contain chlorinated hydrocarbons (i.e., PERC and TCE).
Table 2. Summary descriptors of dry cleaning store transitions to safer dry out cleaning alternatives in King Country, WA, USA.
The butylal process was likewise considered for promotion by the Haz Waste Programme. An added benefit of this organization is that it includes a suite of spot cleaning chemicals that appear to exist relatively safe (72). Nonetheless, butylal was as well ultimately rejected because of uncertainties concerning the solvent's toxicological properties and that the nonetheless bottoms were determined to exist extremely chancy waste matter (72, 89, ninety).
The program learned that the local dry cleaning community was skeptical near the ability of PWC to clean all "dry clean just" fabrics, especially wools and silks. Concerns were also expressed well-nigh potential shrinkage and the transmission labor required to measure garments earlier cleaning to stretch them back to their original dimensions. Even so, a new generation of PWC equipment appeared in approximately 2017, and program staff witnessed the successful cleaning of wool dress suits and silk garments in three shops. Interviews with these store owners and their equipment vendors led the programme to conclude that PWC had become a viable alternative to PERC dry out cleaning and that information technology would promote the adoption of PWC exclusively. The program concluded that the culling organic solvents should no longer be considered for the financial incentive initiative because: (i) they are more combustible than PERC, (2) they generate hazardous waste, and (iii) there are numerous uncertainties and data gaps associated with the toxicology of some of these products. The selection of PWC as the preferred alternative represented a precautionary approach to aid avoid a regrettable substitution.
Implementing a Safer Alternatives Strategy
Having selected PWC equally the preferred alternative to PERC, the Haz Waste matter Programme reviewed the approaches used by other jurisdictions to promote adoption. These included financial assistance, equipment demonstrations, bans, and signage requirements (71). These approaches were evaluated confronting four criteria: (1) homo health and environmental affect, (2) financial impact on dry cleaner owners and workers, (3) feasibility, and (iv) implementation toll. The program selected the strategy of financial incentives considering it had a high likelihood of improved homo health/environment protection, minimized the financial impact to dry cleaners, and limited the chance of "regrettable substitutions." The programme chose not to implement a ban because the US EPA was reviewing PERC nether the amended TSCA and its determination would probable preempt whatever regulations introduced in Rex County, WA, USA. Generally, state and local activeness on a chemical is preempted when EPA has acted by either finding a chemical to exist prophylactic or by regulating a chemical to address identified risks. Land action is also temporarily "paused" when EPA is evaluating a chemical.
The program likewise decided that pursuing a signage regulation would be time-consuming and have petty bear upon. Therefore, the program initiated a airplane pilot project in which dry cleaners would be reimbursed $twenty,000 if they switched from PERC to PWC (71). The plan reserved the option to implement equipment demonstrations, if necessary. Figure ane depicts a photo of one of the participating dry out cleaning shops in the transitioning program.
Figure 1. Photo of the owner at one of the dry cleaner shops participating in the King Canton, WA transition programme. Credits to Tae Park (Sun Cleaners) and the Hazardous Waste Management Programme in Male monarch County, Washington, United states of america.
The strategy to promote the adoption of PWC in King County, WA, U.s.a. is described in particular in a technical report (71). Ultimately, the initiative'due south success hinged on the credible scientific information about PWC already gathered by other programs and the participation of a local Korean-owned vendor, who had get a dealer for Miele PWC equipment. This vendor was established and trusted in the local Korean dry out cleaning customs considering they were already supplying solvents, equipment, and other materials to the industry. The program used an disinterestedness and social justice lens in its intervention. Interactions with the dry cleaning customs needed to be conducted in a culturally advisable fashion, including working closely with the communities to hear their needs, working with community members (including vendors) to promote the program, soliciting community input on the development of promotional materials, providing materials in their native language, and providing estimation services, when necessary. Further, the Washington Land Department of Ecology besides collaborated with the program extensively, providing technical assist and ensuring that all procedures conformed to local environmental regulatory requirements.
Starting in Apr 2018, the vendor visited their existing PERC dry out cleaning clients to advocate for PWC. The programme provided the vendor with promotional materials, which they distributed to the shops. Once the shop owners expressed interest to the vendor, program staff visited the business organization, usually with a Korean vendor representative. The vendor made introductions to the shop owner and provided interpretation aid, as needed. At this visit, program staff administered a survey, inventoried process chemicals, performed leak detection on the PERC automobile with a photoionization detector (PID), and provided the paperwork for reimbursement. Of the approximately 65 remaining PERC dry cleaning shops in Male monarch County, WA, USA, 27 have taken advantage of the reimbursement program and switched to PWC as of October 2020 (Tabular array 2).
Follow-up surveys were conducted 6 months subsequently each shop transitioned to PWC, and the products used with the new equipment were inventoried. Once shops made the switch, they no longer used a hazardous solvent to clean fabrics and no longer generated organic solvent hazardous wastes. Likewise, the ancillary procedure chemicals provided by the PWC vendor (spotting agents, etc.) contain products with ingredients of lower toxicity than those used in PERC operations (74). Although utility data proved difficult to review, ii shops that continually flushed cooling water through their PERC machines reduced their water usage and utility bills dramatically afterward transitioning to PWC. Other studies have documented significantly lower consumption of natural resources (i.due east., gas, electricity, and water) when using PWC compared to PERC (46, 76–78). Most shop owners expressed satisfaction with their conclusion to adopt PWC, with some suggesting that their health had improved (71).
Implications for Future Public Health Research and Policy
Dry cleaning businesses take promoted the adoption of alternative technologies in dry cleaning as "green," in an attempt to change public perception given the increased public awareness of PERC health and environmental issues. Despite marketing efforts to use the technology changes to increment clientele and attract new users, the dry cleaning industry is in a land of turn down (92). The industry'due south financial stress stem from the Great Recession in the United states of america (December 2007–June 2009) and the current recession (2020). This reject also reflects a shrinking client base considering of: (1) changes in the types of fabrics now in common utilize, many of which do not require dry cleaning; (2) technological advances in residential washing machines and dryers, which allow the cleaning of wool and other delicate fabrics at domicile; (3) the availability of in-house dry cleaning and "wash & fold services" at several major corporations; and (4) extended telecommuting and other alternative piece of work arrangements in which workers are no longer required to report to an role. Business owners are also retiring, specially immigrants from South Korea. In Rex Canton, WA, USA, we are besides witnessing considerable consolidation in this manufacture, insofar equally businesses with relatively large facilities and multiple cleaning machines are purchasing neighborhood dry cleaning shops and converting them to drop shops, where fabrics are dropped off by customers then transported to the central facility for cleaning. Although there are health and ecology benefits to conducting cleaning in a light industrial setting distant from neighborhoods, this development is contributing to the demise of the remaining smaller neighborhood shops that are often endemic by financially vulnerable business organisation owners, with pregnant impacts to their employees, who are disproportionately of Asian and Latin American descent.
Regardless of the economic challenges faced by the dry cleaning industry in the United states of america, dry cleaning shops will continue to operate, especially in larger urban areas, and it is important to ensure the health and prophylactic of the workers and the communities served by these small businesses. Therefore, enquiry efforts should exist directed toward understanding and tracking the long-term health effects of exposures to past and nowadays dry cleaning workers, their families, and the surrounding community. Research is particularly needed given the lack of wellness surveillance within these populations of interest. In detail, it would be important to follow the wellness of workers in dry cleaning shops using alternatives to PERC, where nosotros practise not take comprehensive toxicological and human exposure and health data. The impacts of using spot-cleaning agents and other ancillary procedure chemicals should also be evaluated.
Even if PERC is eliminated in the U.s.a. dry cleaning industry, it will exist necessary to proceed to understand the benefits and health impacts from transitioning to alternative solvents and technologies to avoid regrettable substitutions. This feedback loop to appraise existent-life scenarios of these new technologies, particularly equally machines historic period, should be part of the safer alternative strategies, as suggested past OSHA in their guidance Transitioning to Safer Chemicals (Step 7 Evaluate) (93). It is vital to examine the short- and long-term health impacts of PERC exposures on affected workers and communities (3).
A draft risk evaluation study for PERC was released by U.s.a. EPA in April 2020 and the public comment period closed July half dozen, 2020 (36). EPA'south draft risk evaluation preliminarily found unreasonable take chances to workers, occupational non-users, consumers, bystanders, and the surroundings from certain uses. The primary wellness risk identified in the draft take a chance evaluation is neurological effects from short- and long-term exposure. The risk to consumers is from skin exposure to items cleaned with PERC. The bureau also found environmental risks to aquatic organisms.
If the last run a risk evaluation determines that PERC presents an unreasonable risk to human health and the environment, the US EPA would take a risk management activeness under TSCA. The chance evaluation should be finalized by the end of 2020. Once concluding and if risks are found, that starts a 1-yr clock to propose a risk management rule. The U.s.a. EPA besides has the option to establish regulatory restrictions on the manufacture, processing, distribution, utilise, or disposal of PERC to eliminate the unreasonable risk. The US EPA is given a range of take chances management options nether TSCA, including labeling, recordkeeping or notice requirements, actions to reduce man exposure or environmental release, and a ban on the chemical or of certain uses. Similar the prioritization and risk evaluation processes, there is an opportunity for public comment on whatsoever proposed gamble direction deportment.
Conclusions
Although local and country policies in the The states accept played a major role in transitioning dry cleaners from PERC to safer alternatives, identifying safer and more sustainable alternatives to PERC has non been straightforward. Some of these alternatives have been promoted as safe and environmentally friendly, although their effects on human health and the surround may have not been well characterized. Many of the alternative solvents are relatively new products with no established occupational exposure limits (due east.g., glycol ethers and Solvon K4). Unfortunately, the search for dry out cleaning solvents has resulted in regrettable substitutions, such as the utilise of north-PB. However, with recent improvements in PWC, this technology has become an culling to PERC that does non apply potentially harmful solvents and does not generate organic hazardous waste. To ensure the sustainability of the fabric cleaning industry and the wellness of workers and nearby communities, continued investment in transition programs and research into safer alternatives to PERC is needed. Lastly, whatsoever arroyo to promoting safer alternatives should account for the unique financial and cultural characteristics of the industry.
Ethics Argument
Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any identifiable images/fabric in the article.
Author Contributions
DC and SW conceptualized the idea for the manuscript. DC coordinated collaborators and led the writing and reviews of the manuscript. SW led the writing of the instance report, the description of solvent alternatives, and reviews of the manuscript. PJ contributed to the writing of the health section of the manuscript and reviewed the manuscript. KF and AE contributed to the writing of the policy section and case study and reviewed the manuscript. EL contributed to the occupational wellness and exposure limits sections and the review of the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
Office of DC's time writing this manuscript was supported by NIH/NIEHS grant number 2R25ES023635-04. The instance study depicted in the manuscript and the time spent in this manuscript by SW, KF, and AE were funded past the Local Chancy Waste fund, King County, Washington.
Disclaimer
The content and conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and exercise not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. National Plant for Occupational Prophylactic and Wellness, Centers for Affliction Control and Prevention.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the inquiry was conducted in the absenteeism of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed equally a potential disharmonize of involvement.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance and participation of Hazardous Waste Management Program staff, Male monarch County'due south dry cleaners, and the local supplier and vendor customs.
References
2. Gold LS, De Roos AJ, Waters G, Stewart P. Systematic literature review of uses and levels of occupational exposure to tetrachloroethylene. J Occup Environ Hyg. (2008) five:807–39. doi: 10.1080/15459620802510866
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
ix. BLS. Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2017. 51-6011 Laundry and Dry out-Cleaning Workers. (2018). Retrieved from: https://www.bls.gov/oes/2017/may/oes516011.htm (accessed November twenty, 2020).
12. Aschengrau A, Gallagher LG, Winter M, Butler LJ, Patricia FM, Vieira VM. Modeled exposure to tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water and the risk of placenta-related stillbirths: a example-control study from Massachusetts and Rhode Isle. Environ Health Glob Access Sci Source. (2018) 17:58. doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0402-1
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar
15. Chiu WA, Jinot J, Scott CS, Makris SL, Cooper GS, Dzubow RC, et al. Human being health furnishings of trichloroethylene: Key findings and scientific issues. Environ Wellness Perspect. (2013) 121:303–xi. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205879
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
sixteen. Guyton KZ, Hogan KA, Scott CS, Cooper GS, Bale AS, Kopylev L, et al. Human being health effects of tetrachloroethylene: primal findings and scientific issues. Environ Health Perspect. (2014) 122:325–34. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307359
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
17. Vlaanderen J, Straif K, Ruder A, Blair A, Hansen J, Lynge E, et al. Tetrachloroethylene exposure and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis of dry-cleaning-worker studies. Environ Health Perspect. (2014) 122:661–6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307055
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar
18. Vlaanderen J, Straif Yard, Pukkala E, Kauppinen T, Kyyronen P, Martinsen JI, et al. Occupational exposure to trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene and the risk of lymphoma, liver, and kidney cancer in 4 Nordic countries. Occup Environ Med. (2013) seventy:393–401. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2012-101188
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar
21. Echeverria D, White R, Sampaio C. A behavioral evaluation of PCE exposure in patients and dry cleaners: a possible relationship between clinical and preclinical effects. J Occup Environ Med. (1995) 37:667–80. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199506000-00008
PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
23. Ferroni C, Selis Fifty, Mutti A, Folli D, Bergamaschi E, Franchini I. Neurobehavioral and neuroendocrine effects of occupational exposure to perchloroethylene. Neurotoxicology. (1992) thirteen:243.
PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar
24. Spinatonda G, Colombo R, Capodaglio EM, Imbriani Grand, Pasetti C, Minuco G, et al. Processes of speech production: application in a group of subjects chronically exposed to organic solvents (Two). Giorn Ital Med Lavoro Ergonomia. (1997) 19:85.
Google Scholar
25. Altmann L, Neuhann HF, Kramer U, Witten J, Jermann Eastward. Neurobehavioral and neurophysiological outcome of chronic low-level tetrachloroethene exposure measured in neighborhoods of dry cleaning shops. Environ Res. (1995) 69:83–ix. doi: ten.1006/enrs.1995.1028
PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar
26. Janulewicz PA, White RF, Martin BM, Winter MR, Weinberg JM, Vieira V, et al. Developed neuropsychological operation following prenatal and early postnatal exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated drinking water. Neurotoxicol Teratol. (2012) 34:350–9. doi: ten.1016/j.ntt.2012.04.001
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
27. Aschengrau A, Winter MR, Gallagher LG, Vieira VM, Butler LJ, Fabian MP, et al. Reproductive and developmental health effects of prenatal exposure to tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking h2o. Environ Sci Process Impacts. (2020) 22:555–66. doi: x.1039/C9EM00590K
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
28. Wesselink AK, Hatch EE, Wise LA, Rothman KJ, Vieira VM, Aschengrau A. Exposure to tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water and time to pregnancy. Environ Res. (2018) 167:136–43. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.07.012
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
29. Aschengrau A, Weinberg JM, Janulewicz PA, Gallagher LG, Winter MR, Vieira VM, et al. Prenatal exposure to tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water and the risk of congenital anomalies: A retrospective cohort study. Environ Health Global Access Sci Source. (2009) 8:44. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-44
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
30. Aschengrau A, Weinberg JM, Janulewicz PA, Romano ME, Gallagher LG, Winter MR, et al. Occurrence of mental affliction following prenatal and early childhood exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated drinking h2o: a retrospective cohort report. Environ Health Global Access Sci Source. (2012) xi:2. doi: x.1186/1476-069X-11-2
PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
31. Aschengrau A, Janulewicz PA, White RF, Vieira VM, Gallagher LG, Getz KD, et al. Long-term neurotoxic furnishings of early-life exposure to Tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water. Ann Global Wellness. (2016) 82:169–79. doi: ten.1016/j.aogh.2016.01.013
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar
32. Aschengrau A, Weinberg JM, Janulewicz PA, Romano ME, Gallagher LG, Winter MR, et al. Affinity for risky behaviors following prenatal and early on childhood exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated drinking water: a retrospective cohort study. Environ Health Global Access Sci Source. (2011) 10:102. doi: x.1186/1476-069X-x-102
PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
33. Getz KD, Janulewicz PA, Rowe South, Janice M, Weinberg Wintertime MR, Martin BR, et al. Prenatal and early babyhood exposure to tetrachloroethylene and adult vision. Environ Wellness Perspect. (2012) 120:1327–32. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103996
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
34. Aschengrau A, Winter MR, Vieira VM, Webster TF, Janulewicz PA, Gallagher LG, et al. Long-term health effects of early life exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated drinking h2o: a retrospective cohort written report. Environ Health. (2015) xiv:36. doi: x.1186/s12940-015-0021-z
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
35. Vieira V, Webster T, Weinberg J, Aschengrau A. Spatial analysis of float, kidney, and pancreatic cancer on upper Cape Cod: an application of generalized additive models to example-command data. Environ Health Global Access Sci Source. (2009) 8:iii. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-viii-3
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
46. Troynikov O, Watson C, Jadhav A, Nawaz N, Kettlewell R. Towards sustainable and safe apparel cleaning methods: a review. J Environ Manag. (2016) 182:252–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.078
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
48. CDC. Neurologic illness associated with occupational exposure to the solvent 1-bromopropane–New Jersey and Pennsylvania, 2007-2008. Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. (2008) 57:1300–2.
Google Scholar
49. ACGIH. 2019 TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemic Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (2019).
l. Blando JD, Schill DP, De La Cruz MP, Zhang Fifty, Zhang J. Preliminary study of propyl bromide exposure amidst New Bailiwick of jersey dry cleaners as a result of a pending ban on perchloroethylene. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. (2012) 60:1049–56. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.9.1049
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
52. Genualdi South, Harner T, Cheng Y, Macleod 1000, Hansen KM, van Egmond R, et al. Global distribution of linear and cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes in air. Environ Sci Technol. (2011) 45:3349–54. doi: 10.1021/es200301j
PubMed Abstruse | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
54. Jean PA, Sloter ED, Plotzke KP. Effects of chronic exposure to octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane in the crumbling female Fischer 344 rat. Toxicol Lett. (2017) 279:54–74. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.08.016
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
60. Kreussler. What Landlords Need to Know About SystemK4. Tampa, FL: Kreussler (2010).
Google Scholar
61. NYSDEC. DraftMemorandum: Toxic Contaminant Review of the Butylal Dry-Cleaning Solvent (Currently Marketed Nether the Trade Proper name SolvonK4 by Kreussler, Inc.). New York, NY: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (2011).
64. Ceballos DM, Whittaker SG, Lee EG, Roberts J, Streicher R, Nourian F, et al. Occupational exposures to new dry cleaning solvents: high-flashpoint hydrocarbons and butylal. J Occup Environ Hyg. (2016) 13:759–69. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1177648
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
65. NIOSH. Evaluation of Occupational Exposures at Drycleaning Shops That Apply SolvonK4 and DF-2000 (No. HHE Report 2012-0084-3227). Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human being Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2015).
Google Scholar
67. Mckee RH, Adenuga Medico, Carrillo JC. Label of the toxicological hazards of hydrocarbon solvents. Crit Rev Toxicol. (2015) 45:273–365. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2015.1016216
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
73. Whittaker SG, Taylor J, Van Hooser LM. Characterization of "hydrocarbon" dry out cleaning in King County, Washington. J Environ Health. (2015) 78:8–thirteen.
PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar
75. Gottlieb R. Dry cleaning'due south dilemma and opportunity: Overcoming chemical dependencies and creating a community of interests. In: Gottlieb R, editor. Environmentalism Unbound. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2001). p. 101–339.
76. Onasch J. A feasibility and price comparing of perchloroethylene dry cleaning to professional person wet cleaning: Case study of Silver Hanger Cleaners, Bellingham, Massachusetts. J Make clean Prod. (2011) 19:477–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.07.015
CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
77. Onasch J, Jacobs 1000, Biddle East. From perchloroethylene dry cleaning to professional wet cleaning: making the wellness and business case for reducing toxics. J Environ Wellness. (2017) 79:E1−seven.
Google Scholar
78. Sinsheimer P, Grout C, Namkoong A, Gottlieb R. The viability of professional wet cleaning as a pollution prevention alternative to perchloroethylene dry cleaning. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. (2007) 57:172–viii. doi: x.1080/10473289.2007.10465320
PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
eighty. City of Minneapolis. After Helping Dry out Cleaners Switch to Cleaner Processes, Minneapolis Bans Hazardous 'Perc' (2019). Retrieved from: http://world wide web.ci.minneapolis.mn.united states of america/news/WCMSP-220375 (accessed November 20, 2020).
83. Whittaker SG, Johanson CA. A health and environmental profile of the dry cleaning industry in Rex County, Washington. J Environ Wellness. (2013) 75:fourteen–22.
PubMed Abstruse | Google Scholar
84. NIOSH. Health Take a chance Evaluation Written report: Evaluation of Occupational Exposures at a Drycleaning Shop Using SolvonK4 HETA 2012-0084-3227. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2015). Retrieved from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/27676 (accessed November twenty, 2020).
86. Chevron Phillips. Material Safety Data Sail for ECOSOLV® Dry Cleaning Fluid Revision No. 8.01. The Woodlands, TX: Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP (2008).
87. ExxonMobil. Textile Safe Data Sheet for DF-2000 Fluid (No. 92842583). Houston, TX: ExxonMobil Chemical Visitor (2001).
89. Ecology. Biological Testing Methods eighty-12 - for the Designation of Dangerous Waste (2009). Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Environmental. Retrieved from: https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/summarypages/8012.html (accessed November twenty, 2020).
ninety. Ecology. Chapter 173-303 WAC: Dangerous Waste matter Regulations (No. 15-04-007). Olympia, WA: Washington State Section of Ecology (2014). Retrieved from: https://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=173-303 (accessed November 20, 2020).
92. IBISWorld. Industry Market Research, Reports, and Statistics. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.ibisworld.com/default.aspx (accessed Nov twenty, 2020).
Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.638082/full
Posted by: cruzbuthend.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How Long Has The Dry Cleaning Industry Been Shrinking"
Post a Comment